aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/string/strnlen.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAdhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>2023-01-10 18:00:55 -0300
committerAdhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>2023-02-06 16:19:35 -0300
commit0f4254311ebf15b8f3f6f66182e8dd5151a58a88 (patch)
tree9a03470d7c7ec394b35cecaf2e1b57a7e8dc08cc /string/strnlen.c
parent2a8867a17ffe5c5a4251fd40bf6c73a3fd426062 (diff)
downloadglibc-0f4254311ebf15b8f3f6f66182e8dd5151a58a88.tar
glibc-0f4254311ebf15b8f3f6f66182e8dd5151a58a88.tar.gz
glibc-0f4254311ebf15b8f3f6f66182e8dd5151a58a88.tar.bz2
glibc-0f4254311ebf15b8f3f6f66182e8dd5151a58a88.zip
string: Improve generic strnlen with memchr
It also cleanups the multiple inclusion by leaving the ifunc implementation to undef the weak_alias and libc_hidden_def. Co-authored-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'string/strnlen.c')
-rw-r--r--string/strnlen.c137
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 132 deletions
diff --git a/string/strnlen.c b/string/strnlen.c
index 6ff294eab1..dc23354ec8 100644
--- a/string/strnlen.c
+++ b/string/strnlen.c
@@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
/* Find the length of STRING, but scan at most MAXLEN characters.
Copyright (C) 1991-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
- Based on strlen written by Torbjorn Granlund (tege@sics.se),
- with help from Dan Sahlin (dan@sics.se);
- commentary by Jim Blandy (jimb@ai.mit.edu).
-
The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as
published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the
@@ -20,7 +16,6 @@
not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
#include <string.h>
-#include <stdlib.h>
/* Find the length of S, but scan at most MAXLEN characters. If no
'\0' terminator is found in that many characters, return MAXLEN. */
@@ -32,134 +27,12 @@
size_t
__strnlen (const char *str, size_t maxlen)
{
- const char *char_ptr, *end_ptr = str + maxlen;
- const unsigned long int *longword_ptr;
- unsigned long int longword, himagic, lomagic;
-
- if (maxlen == 0)
- return 0;
-
- if (__glibc_unlikely (end_ptr < str))
- end_ptr = (const char *) ~0UL;
-
- /* Handle the first few characters by reading one character at a time.
- Do this until CHAR_PTR is aligned on a longword boundary. */
- for (char_ptr = str; ((unsigned long int) char_ptr
- & (sizeof (longword) - 1)) != 0;
- ++char_ptr)
- if (*char_ptr == '\0')
- {
- if (char_ptr > end_ptr)
- char_ptr = end_ptr;
- return char_ptr - str;
- }
-
- /* All these elucidatory comments refer to 4-byte longwords,
- but the theory applies equally well to 8-byte longwords. */
-
- longword_ptr = (unsigned long int *) char_ptr;
-
- /* Bits 31, 24, 16, and 8 of this number are zero. Call these bits
- the "holes." Note that there is a hole just to the left of
- each byte, with an extra at the end:
-
- bits: 01111110 11111110 11111110 11111111
- bytes: AAAAAAAA BBBBBBBB CCCCCCCC DDDDDDDD
-
- The 1-bits make sure that carries propagate to the next 0-bit.
- The 0-bits provide holes for carries to fall into. */
- himagic = 0x80808080L;
- lomagic = 0x01010101L;
- if (sizeof (longword) > 4)
- {
- /* 64-bit version of the magic. */
- /* Do the shift in two steps to avoid a warning if long has 32 bits. */
- himagic = ((himagic << 16) << 16) | himagic;
- lomagic = ((lomagic << 16) << 16) | lomagic;
- }
- if (sizeof (longword) > 8)
- abort ();
-
- /* Instead of the traditional loop which tests each character,
- we will test a longword at a time. The tricky part is testing
- if *any of the four* bytes in the longword in question are zero. */
- while (longword_ptr < (unsigned long int *) end_ptr)
- {
- /* We tentatively exit the loop if adding MAGIC_BITS to
- LONGWORD fails to change any of the hole bits of LONGWORD.
-
- 1) Is this safe? Will it catch all the zero bytes?
- Suppose there is a byte with all zeros. Any carry bits
- propagating from its left will fall into the hole at its
- least significant bit and stop. Since there will be no
- carry from its most significant bit, the LSB of the
- byte to the left will be unchanged, and the zero will be
- detected.
-
- 2) Is this worthwhile? Will it ignore everything except
- zero bytes? Suppose every byte of LONGWORD has a bit set
- somewhere. There will be a carry into bit 8. If bit 8
- is set, this will carry into bit 16. If bit 8 is clear,
- one of bits 9-15 must be set, so there will be a carry
- into bit 16. Similarly, there will be a carry into bit
- 24. If one of bits 24-30 is set, there will be a carry
- into bit 31, so all of the hole bits will be changed.
-
- The one misfire occurs when bits 24-30 are clear and bit
- 31 is set; in this case, the hole at bit 31 is not
- changed. If we had access to the processor carry flag,
- we could close this loophole by putting the fourth hole
- at bit 32!
-
- So it ignores everything except 128's, when they're aligned
- properly. */
-
- longword = *longword_ptr++;
-
- if ((longword - lomagic) & himagic)
- {
- /* Which of the bytes was the zero? If none of them were, it was
- a misfire; continue the search. */
-
- const char *cp = (const char *) (longword_ptr - 1);
-
- char_ptr = cp;
- if (cp[0] == 0)
- break;
- char_ptr = cp + 1;
- if (cp[1] == 0)
- break;
- char_ptr = cp + 2;
- if (cp[2] == 0)
- break;
- char_ptr = cp + 3;
- if (cp[3] == 0)
- break;
- if (sizeof (longword) > 4)
- {
- char_ptr = cp + 4;
- if (cp[4] == 0)
- break;
- char_ptr = cp + 5;
- if (cp[5] == 0)
- break;
- char_ptr = cp + 6;
- if (cp[6] == 0)
- break;
- char_ptr = cp + 7;
- if (cp[7] == 0)
- break;
- }
- }
- char_ptr = end_ptr;
- }
-
- if (char_ptr > end_ptr)
- char_ptr = end_ptr;
- return char_ptr - str;
+ const char *found = memchr (str, '\0', maxlen);
+ return found ? found - str : maxlen;
}
+
#ifndef STRNLEN
-libc_hidden_def (__strnlen)
weak_alias (__strnlen, strnlen)
-#endif
+libc_hidden_def (__strnlen)
libc_hidden_def (strnlen)
+#endif