diff options
| author | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2021-10-26 09:02:57 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2021-10-29 09:21:37 -0300 |
| commit | 3d5ecb624638627869e6965410f558b15db6946e (patch) | |
| tree | 07989c89c19c217d024e4d7d3dc63ba0435673e2 /conform | |
| parent | 66a273d16a63d1ed74a8d14a210a04c6a0f5dd45 (diff) | |
| download | glibc-3d5ecb624638627869e6965410f558b15db6946e.tar glibc-3d5ecb624638627869e6965410f558b15db6946e.tar.gz glibc-3d5ecb624638627869e6965410f558b15db6946e.tar.bz2 glibc-3d5ecb624638627869e6965410f558b15db6946e.zip | |
Fix LIBC_PROG_BINUTILS for -fuse-ld=lld
GCC does not print the correct linker when -fuse-ld=lld is used with
the -print-prog-name=ld:
$ gcc -v 2>&1 | tail -n 1
gcc version 11.2.0 (Ubuntu 11.2.0-7ubuntu2)
$ gcc
ld
This is different than for gold:
$ gcc -fuse-ld=gold -print-prog-name=ld
ld.gold
Using ld.lld as the static linker name prints the expected result.
This is only required when -fuse-ld=lld is used, if lld is used as
the 'ld' programs (through a symlink) LIBC_PROG_BINUTILS works
as expected.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'conform')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions