aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/FAQ.in
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>1998-07-17 21:47:07 +0000
committerUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>1998-07-17 21:47:07 +0000
commitb061066838c74d533a77e405a53a57059c5f68f6 (patch)
treeef9ef5d4db9fad903ebf96f394142bd5c90ba165 /FAQ.in
parent07435eb48c6acb0313a8957257af4771e9e55030 (diff)
downloadglibc-b061066838c74d533a77e405a53a57059c5f68f6.tar
glibc-b061066838c74d533a77e405a53a57059c5f68f6.tar.gz
glibc-b061066838c74d533a77e405a53a57059c5f68f6.tar.bz2
glibc-b061066838c74d533a77e405a53a57059c5f68f6.zip
Strictly check whether catalog file is larger enough for the data.
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ.in')
-rw-r--r--FAQ.in24
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/FAQ.in b/FAQ.in
index 5ec49c3788..3f6aa3aa79 100644
--- a/FAQ.in
+++ b/FAQ.in
@@ -277,6 +277,30 @@ the library names.
The compilation of these extra libraries and the compiler optimizations slow
down the build process and need more disk space.
+?? I get failures during `make check'. What shall I do?
+
+{AJ} The testsuite should compile and run cleanly on your system, every
+failure should be looked into. Depending on the failure I wouldn't advise
+installing the library at all.
+
+You should consider using the `glibcbug' script to report the failure,
+providing as much detail as possible. If you run a test directly, please
+remember to set up the environment correctly. You want to test the compiled
+library - and not your installed one. The best way is to copy the exact
+command line which failed and run the test from the subdirectory for this
+test in the sources.
+
+There are some failures which are not directly related to the GNU libc:
+- Some compiler produce buggy code. The current egcs snapshots are ok and
+ the not yet released egcs 1.1 should be ok. gcc 2.8.1 might cause some
+ failures, gcc 2.7.2.x is so buggy, that explicit checks have been used so
+ that you can't build with it.
+- The kernel might have bugs. For example on Linux/Alpha 2.0.34 the
+ floating point handling has quite a number of bugs and therefore most of
+ the test cases in the math subdirectory will fail. The current Linux 2.1
+ development kernels have fixes for the floating point support on Alpha.
+
+
? Installation and configuration issues
?? Can I replace the libc on my Linux system with GNU libc?