diff options
| author | Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> | 2019-06-10 22:12:08 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> | 2019-06-10 22:12:08 +0000 |
| commit | e6e24243905957c36596f50a22af0acfd83793e2 (patch) | |
| tree | 59a8709521107ec13118a52a96488501c5608b67 | |
| parent | 51ea67d54882318c4fa5394c386f4816ddc22408 (diff) | |
| download | glibc-e6e24243905957c36596f50a22af0acfd83793e2.tar glibc-e6e24243905957c36596f50a22af0acfd83793e2.tar.gz glibc-e6e24243905957c36596f50a22af0acfd83793e2.tar.bz2 glibc-e6e24243905957c36596f50a22af0acfd83793e2.zip | |
Fix malloc tests build with GCC 10.
GCC mainline has recently added warn_unused_result attributes to some
malloc-like built-in functions, where glibc previously had them in its
headers only for __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL > 0. This results in those
attributes being newly in effect for building the glibc testsuite, so
resulting in new warnings that break the build where tests
deliberately call such functions and ignore the result. Thus patch
duly adds calls to DIAG_* macros around those calls to disable the
warning.
Tested with build-many-glibcs.py for aarch64-linux-gnu.
* malloc/tst-calloc.c: Include <libc-diag.h>.
(null_test): Ignore -Wunused-result around calls to calloc.
* malloc/tst-mallocfork.c: Include <libc-diag.h>.
(do_test): Ignore -Wunused-result around call to malloc.
| -rw-r--r-- | ChangeLog | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | malloc/tst-calloc.c | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | malloc/tst-mallocfork.c | 6 |
3 files changed, 19 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2019-06-10 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> + + * malloc/tst-calloc.c: Include <libc-diag.h>. + (null_test): Ignore -Wunused-result around calls to calloc. + * malloc/tst-mallocfork.c: Include <libc-diag.h>. + (do_test): Ignore -Wunused-result around call to malloc. + 2019-06-07 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> Linux: Add getdents64 system call. diff --git a/malloc/tst-calloc.c b/malloc/tst-calloc.c index 1eac6aecfc..aa3f26d7d7 100644 --- a/malloc/tst-calloc.c +++ b/malloc/tst-calloc.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <malloc.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> +#include <libc-diag.h> /* Number of samples per size. */ @@ -95,12 +96,16 @@ static void null_test (void) { /* If the size is 0 the result is implementation defined. Just make - sure the program doesn't crash. */ + sure the program doesn't crash. The result of calloc is + deliberately ignored, so do not warn about that. */ + DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (10, "-Wunused-result"); calloc (0, 0); calloc (0, UINT_MAX); calloc (UINT_MAX, 0); calloc (0, ~((size_t) 0)); calloc (~((size_t) 0), 0); + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; } diff --git a/malloc/tst-mallocfork.c b/malloc/tst-mallocfork.c index 4ff6ec09f4..00851a16c3 100644 --- a/malloc/tst-mallocfork.c +++ b/malloc/tst-mallocfork.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/wait.h> +#include <libc-diag.h> static void sig_handler (int signum) @@ -25,7 +26,12 @@ do_test (void) struct sigaction action = { .sa_handler = sig_handler }; sigemptyset (&action.sa_mask); + DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (10, "-Wunused-result"); + /* The result of malloc is deliberately ignored, so do not warn + about that. */ malloc (sizeof (int)); + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; if (sigaction (SIGALRM, &action, NULL) != 0) { |