diff options
| author | sdeng <sdeng@google.com> | 2019-06-05 20:40:16 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Sai Deng <sdeng@google.com> | 2019-06-06 03:51:52 +0000 |
| commit | ed8e473581015e14d106b59c5e01210b7a7a43cf (patch) | |
| tree | 240407772bd4b3559fc6a0bc52357457c6bb51a3 | |
| parent | 1f11352c071da81c2f65ae7673415910f7110755 (diff) | |
| download | libvpx-ed8e473581015e14d106b59c5e01210b7a7a43cf.tar libvpx-ed8e473581015e14d106b59c5e01210b7a7a43cf.tar.gz libvpx-ed8e473581015e14d106b59c5e01210b7a7a43cf.tar.bz2 libvpx-ed8e473581015e14d106b59c5e01210b7a7a43cf.zip | |
Update performance test results for tune=SSIM
I made a mistake (used the outdated baseline) in the CL I
submitted earlier this week:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/webm/libvpx/+/1638854
The corrected results are following:
The additional gains/loss on top of the tune=ssim are:
Data Set Overall PSNR SSIM MS-SSIM
Lowres 3.490 -3.164 -2.267
Midres 2.245 -2.270 -2.287
HDres 2.562 -1.804 -1.681
Lowres_10bd 3.477 -2.399 -2.689
Midres_10bd 3.467 -1.534 -1.636
The overall gains/loss comparing to tune=psnr are:
Data Set Overall PSNR SSIM MS-SSIM
Lowres 6.127 -5.818 -4.783
Midres 4.574 -5.383 -6.242
HDres 4.908 -6.218 -7.106
Lowres_10bd 6.115 -6.212 -7.790
Midres_10bd 6.238 -6.064 -7.249
Change-Id: Iae72482f7b30f200e5021a98c920eed841d0972a
| -rw-r--r-- | vp9/encoder/vp9_encoder.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/vp9/encoder/vp9_encoder.c b/vp9/encoder/vp9_encoder.c index 04ae7d19b..4f162e2a3 100644 --- a/vp9/encoder/vp9_encoder.c +++ b/vp9/encoder/vp9_encoder.c @@ -4759,9 +4759,9 @@ static void set_frame_index(VP9_COMP *cpi, VP9_COMMON *cm) { // Some sample values are: // (for midres test set) // SSIM_VAR_SCALE avg_psnr ssim ms_ssim -// 8.0 8.980 -5.767 -7.069 -// 16.0 4.315 -5.610 -6.411 -// 32.0 1.559 -4.541 -4.980 +// 8.0 9.421 -5.537 -6.898 +// 16.0 4.703 -5.378 -6.238 +// 32.0 1.929 -4.308 -4.807 #define SSIM_VAR_SCALE 16.0 static void set_mb_ssim_rdmult_scaling(VP9_COMP *cpi) { VP9_COMMON *cm = &cpi->common; |