| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The macros lll_trylock, lll_cond_trylock are extended by an __glibc_unlikely
hint. Now the trylock macros are based on the same assumption about a
free/busy lock as lll_lock.
With the hint gcc emits code in e.g. pthread_mutex_trylock which does
not use jumps if the lock is free. Without the hint it had to jump away
if the lock is free.
Tested on s390x, ppc.
ChangeLog:
* sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h (lll_trylock, lll_cond_trylock):
Add __glibc_unlikely hint.
|
|
lll_robust_unlock on i386 and x86_64 first sets the futex word to
FUTEX_WAITERS|0 before calling __lll_unlock_wake, which will set the
futex word to 0. If the thread is killed between these steps, then the
futex word will be FUTEX_WAITERS|0, and the kernel (at least current
upstream) will not set it to FUTEX_OWNER_DIED|FUTEX_WAITERS because 0 is
not equal to the TID of the crashed thread.
The lll_robust_lock assembly code on i386 and x86_64 is not prepared to
deal with this case because the fastpath tries to only CAS 0 to TID and
not FUTEX_WAITERS|0 to TID; the slowpath simply waits until it can CAS 0
to TID or the futex_word has the FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit set.
This issue is fixed by removing the custom x86 assembly code and using
the generic C code instead. However, instead of adding more duplicate
code to the custom x86 lowlevellock.h, the code of the lll_robust* functions
is inlined into the single call sites that exist for each of these functions
in the pthread_mutex_* functions. The robust mutex paths in the latter
have been slightly reorganized to make them simpler.
This patch is meant to be easy to backport, so C11-style atomics are not
used.
[BZ #20985]
* nptl/Makefile: Adapt.
* nptl/pthread_mutex_cond_lock.c (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK): Remove.
(LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER): New.
* nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK): Remove.
(LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER): New.
(__pthread_mutex_lock_full): Inline lll_robust* functions and adapt.
* nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c (pthread_mutex_timedlock): Inline
lll_robust* functions and adapt.
* nptl/pthread_mutex_unlock.c (__pthread_mutex_unlock_full): Likewise.
* sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h (__lll_robust_lock_wait,
__lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, __lll_robust_timedlock_wait,
__lll_robust_timedlock, __lll_robust_unlock): Remove.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevellock.h (lll_robust_lock,
lll_robust_cond_lock, lll_robust_timedlock, lll_robust_unlock): Remove.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.h (lll_robust_lock,
lll_robust_cond_lock, lll_robust_timedlock, lll_robust_unlock): Remove.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/lowlevellock.h (__lll_robust_lock_wait,
__lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, __lll_robust_timedlock_wait,
__lll_robust_timedlock, __lll_robust_unlock): Remove.
* nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c: Remove file.
* nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.sym: Likewise.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevelrobustlock.S: Likewise.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevelrobustlock.S: Likewise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
POSIX and C++11 require that a thread can destroy a mutex if no other
thread owns the mutex, is blocked on the mutex, or will try to acquire
it in the future. After destroying the mutex, it can reuse or unmap the
underlying memory. Thus, we must not access a mutex' memory after
releasing it. Currently, we can load the private flag after releasing
the mutex, which is fixed by this patch.
See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13690 for more
background.
We need to call futex_wake on the lock after releasing it, however. This
is by design, and can lead to spurious wake-ups on unrelated futex words
(e.g., when the mutex memory is reused for another mutex). This behavior
is documented in the glibc-internal futex API and in recent drafts of the
Linux kernel's futex documentation (see the draft_futex branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git).
|
|
|
|
Patch by Bernard Ogden <bernie.ogden@linaro.org>.
|
|
2014-08-12 Bernard Ogden <bernie.ogden@linaro.org>
[BZ #16892]
* sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h (__lll_timedlock): Use
atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq rather than atomic_exchange_acq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
