1 files changed, 0 insertions, 116 deletions
diff --git a/nptl/tst-rwlock15.c b/nptl/tst-rwlock15.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 78225fea27..0000000000
--- a/nptl/tst-rwlock15.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,116 +0,0 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 2015-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-   This file is part of the GNU C Library.
-
-   The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
-   modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
-   License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
-   version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
-
-   The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
-   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
-   Lesser General Public License for more details.
-
-   You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
-   License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
-   <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
-
-/* This tests that a writer that is preferred -- but times out due to a
-   reader being present -- does not miss to wake other readers blocked on the
-   writer's pending lock acquisition.  */
-
-#include <errno.h>
-#include <pthread.h>
-#include <stdio.h>
-#include <stdlib.h>
-#include <time.h>
-
-/* The bug existed in the code that strictly prefers writers over readers.  */
-static pthread_rwlock_t r = PTHREAD_RWLOCK_WRITER_NONRECURSIVE_INITIALIZER_NP;
-
-static void *
-writer (void *arg)
-{
-  struct timespec ts;
-  if (clock_gettime (CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts) != 0)
-    {
-      puts ("clock_gettime failed");
-      exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
-    }
-  ts.tv_sec += 1;
-  int e = pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock (&r, &ts);
-  if (e != ETIMEDOUT)
-    {
-      puts ("timedwrlock did not time out");
-      exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
-    }
-  return NULL;
-}
-
-static void *
-reader (void *arg)
-{
-  /* This isn't a reliable way to get the interleaving we need (because a
-     failed trylock doesn't synchronize with the writer, and because we could
-     try to lock after the writer has already timed out).  However, both will
-     just lead to false positives.  */
-  int e;
-  while ((e = pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock (&r)) != EBUSY)
-    {
-      if (e != 0)
-	exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
-      pthread_rwlock_unlock (&r);
-    }
-  e = pthread_rwlock_rdlock (&r);
-  if (e != 0)
-    {
-      puts ("reader rdlock failed");
-      exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
-    }
-  pthread_rwlock_unlock (&r);
-  return NULL;
-}
-
-
-static int
-do_test (void)
-{
-  /* Grab a rdlock, then create a writer and a reader, and wait until they
-     finished.  */
-
-  if (pthread_rwlock_rdlock (&r) != 0)
-    {
-      puts ("initial rdlock failed");
-      return 1;
-    }
-
-  pthread_t thw;
-  if (pthread_create (&thw, NULL, writer, NULL) != 0)
-    {
-      puts ("create failed");
-      return 1;
-    }
-  pthread_t thr;
-  if (pthread_create (&thr, NULL, reader, NULL) != 0)
-    {
-      puts ("create failed");
-      return 1;
-    }
-
-  if (pthread_join (thw, NULL) != 0)
-    {
-      puts ("writer join failed");
-      return 1;
-    }
-  if (pthread_join (thr, NULL) != 0)
-    {
-      puts ("reader join failed");
-      return 1;
-    }
-
-  return 0;
-}
-
-
-#define TEST_FUNCTION do_test ()
-#include "../test-skeleton.c"