aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sysdeps/s390/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2016-08-31 14:54:55 +0200
committerStefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2016-08-31 14:54:55 +0200
commite9b424881a4f85284e56d8b561c54ff57a7c1c9b (patch)
treef039d44b1026ba426ef87f128c85e2abdb224f36 /sysdeps/s390/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c
parentaaf30454802855d439f3d4d1a12fd6b905621029 (diff)
downloadglibc-e9b424881a4f85284e56d8b561c54ff57a7c1c9b.tar
glibc-e9b424881a4f85284e56d8b561c54ff57a7c1c9b.tar.gz
glibc-e9b424881a4f85284e56d8b561c54ff57a7c1c9b.tar.bz2
glibc-e9b424881a4f85284e56d8b561c54ff57a7c1c9b.zip
S390: Do not set FE_INEXACT with feraiseexcept (FE_OWERFLOW|FE_UNDERFLOW).
On s390 feraiseexcept (FE_OVERFLOW|FE_UNDERFLOW) sets FE_INEXACT, too. This patch uses z196 zarch load rounded instruction which can suppress FE_INEXACT exception if gcc has z196 support in used configuration. Otherwise FE_INEXACT flag is set as before. The gcc support is tested in a new configure-check. A comment in fsetexcptflg.c is corrected as new exceptions are not executed with the next floating-point instruction if fpc is set with _FPU_SETCW macro. It seems the comment was copied e.g. from sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/fsetexcptflg.c file. ChangeLog: * config.h.in (HAVE_S390_MIN_Z196_ZARCH_ASM_SUPPORT): New undefine. * sysdeps/s390/configure.ac: Add test for z196 zarch support. * sysdeps/s390/configure: Regenerated. * sysdeps/s390/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c (__feraiseexcept): Use ledbra instruction for raising over-/underflow if z196 zarch is supported by default. * sysdeps/s390/fpu/fsetexcptflg.c (fesetexceptflag): Correct comment.
Diffstat (limited to 'sysdeps/s390/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c')
-rw-r--r--sysdeps/s390/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c41
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/sysdeps/s390/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c b/sysdeps/s390/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c
index 92a1a7db68..ac6dfe7739 100644
--- a/sysdeps/s390/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c
+++ b/sysdeps/s390/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c
@@ -35,6 +35,23 @@ fexceptadd (float d, float e)
__asm__ __volatile__ ("aebr %0,%1" : : "f" (d), "f" (e) );
}
+#ifdef HAVE_S390_MIN_Z196_ZARCH_ASM_SUPPORT
+static __inline__ void
+fexceptround (double e)
+{
+ float d;
+ /* Load rounded from double to float with M3 = round toward 0, M4 = Suppress
+ IEEE-inexact exception.
+ In case of e=0x1p128 and the overflow-mask bit is zero, only the
+ IEEE-overflow flag is set. If overflow-mask bit is one, DXC field is set to
+ 0x20 "IEEE overflow, exact".
+ In case of e=0x1p-150 and the underflow-mask bit is zero, only the
+ IEEE-underflow flag is set. If underflow-mask bit is one, DXC field is set
+ to 0x10 "IEEE underflow, exact".
+ This instruction is available with a zarch machine >= z196. */
+ __asm__ __volatile__ ("ledbra %0,5,%1,4" : "=f" (d) : "f" (e) );
+}
+#endif
int
__feraiseexcept (int excepts)
@@ -54,13 +71,29 @@ __feraiseexcept (int excepts)
/* Next: overflow. */
if (FE_OVERFLOW & excepts)
- /* I don't think we can do the same trick as intel so we will have
- to live with inexact coming also. */
- fexceptadd (FLT_MAX, 1.0e32);
+ {
+#ifdef HAVE_S390_MIN_Z196_ZARCH_ASM_SUPPORT
+ fexceptround (0x1p128);
+#else
+ /* If overflow-mask bit is zero, both IEEE-overflow and IEEE-inexact flags
+ are set. If overflow-mask bit is one, DXC field is set to 0x2C "IEEE
+ overflow, inexact and incremented". */
+ fexceptadd (FLT_MAX, 1.0e32);
+#endif
+ }
/* Next: underflow. */
if (FE_UNDERFLOW & excepts)
- fexceptdiv (FLT_MIN, 3.0);
+ {
+#ifdef HAVE_S390_MIN_Z196_ZARCH_ASM_SUPPORT
+ fexceptround (0x1p-150);
+#else
+ /* If underflow-mask bit is zero, both IEEE-underflow and IEEE-inexact
+ flags are set. If underflow-mask bit is one, DXC field is set to 0x1C
+ "IEEE underflow, inexact and incremented". */
+ fexceptdiv (FLT_MIN, 3.0);
+#endif
+ }
/* Last: inexact. */
if (FE_INEXACT & excepts)