diff options
author | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2018-12-18 16:30:56 -0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2019-04-18 17:30:06 -0300 |
commit | 9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206 (patch) | |
tree | f79f17de093731f502dee183888a491d88263f78 /malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c | |
parent | 52faba65f84ee5a8d82ff813bcfa0ee5f4d480cf (diff) | |
download | glibc-9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206.tar glibc-9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206.tar.gz glibc-9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206.tar.bz2 glibc-9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206.zip |
malloc: make malloc fail with requests larger than PTRDIFF_MAX (BZ#23741)
As discussed previously on libc-alpha [1], this patch follows up the idea
and add both the __attribute_alloc_size__ on malloc functions (malloc,
calloc, realloc, reallocarray, valloc, pvalloc, and memalign) and limit
maximum requested allocation size to up PTRDIFF_MAX (taking into
consideration internal padding and alignment).
This aligns glibc with gcc expected size defined by default warning
-Walloc-size-larger-than value which warns for allocation larger than
PTRDIFF_MAX. It also aligns with gcc expectation regarding libc and
expected size, such as described in PR#67999 [2] and previously discussed
ISO C11 issues [3] on libc-alpha.
From the RFC thread [4] and previous discussion, it seems that consensus
is only to limit such requested size for malloc functions, not the system
allocation one (mmap, sbrk, etc.).
The implementation changes checked_request2size to check for both overflow
and maximum object size up to PTRDIFF_MAX. No additional checks are done
on sysmalloc, so it can still issue mmap with values larger than
PTRDIFF_T depending on the requested size.
The __attribute_alloc_size__ is for functions that return a pointer only,
which means it cannot be applied to posix_memalign (see remarks in GCC
PR#87683 [5]). The runtimes checks to limit maximum requested allocation
size does applies to posix_memalign.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu.
[1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-11/msg00223.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=67999
[3] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-12/msg00066.html
[4] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-11/msg00224.html
[5] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87683
[BZ #23741]
* malloc/hooks.c (malloc_check, realloc_check): Use
__builtin_add_overflow on overflow check and adapt to
checked_request2size change.
* malloc/malloc.c (__libc_malloc, __libc_realloc, _mid_memalign,
__libc_pvalloc, __libc_calloc, _int_memalign): Limit maximum
allocation size to PTRDIFF_MAX.
(REQUEST_OUT_OF_RANGE): Remove macro.
(checked_request2size): Change to inline function and limit maximum
requested size to PTRDIFF_MAX.
(__libc_malloc, __libc_realloc, _int_malloc, _int_memalign): Limit
maximum allocation size to PTRDIFF_MAX.
(_mid_memalign): Use _int_memalign call for overflow check.
(__libc_pvalloc): Use __builtin_add_overflow on overflow check.
(__libc_calloc): Use __builtin_mul_overflow for overflow check and
limit maximum requested size to PTRDIFF_MAX.
* malloc/malloc.h (malloc, calloc, realloc, reallocarray, memalign,
valloc, pvalloc): Add __attribute_alloc_size__.
* stdlib/stdlib.h (malloc, realloc, reallocarray, valloc): Likewise.
* malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c (do_test): Add check for allocation
larger than PTRDIFF_MAX.
* malloc/tst-memalign.c (do_test): Disable -Walloc-size-larger-than=
around tests of malloc with negative sizes.
* malloc/tst-posix_memalign.c (do_test): Likewise.
* malloc/tst-pvalloc.c (do_test): Likewise.
* malloc/tst-valloc.c (do_test): Likewise.
* malloc/tst-reallocarray.c (do_test): Replace call to reallocarray
with resulting size allocation larger than PTRDIFF_MAX with
reallocarray_nowarn.
(reallocarray_nowarn): New function.
* NEWS: Mention the malloc function semantic change.
Diffstat (limited to 'malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c')
-rw-r--r-- | malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c | 49 |
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c b/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c index 15e25f558e..c1c8cb88cc 100644 --- a/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c +++ b/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c @@ -72,13 +72,28 @@ test_large_allocations (size_t size) void * ptr_to_realloc; test_setup (); + DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + /* GCC 7 warns about too-large allocations; here we want to test + that they fail. */ + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (malloc (size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); ptr_to_realloc = malloc (16); TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (ptr_to_realloc != NULL); test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (realloc (ptr_to_realloc, size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); free (ptr_to_realloc); @@ -135,7 +150,13 @@ test_large_aligned_allocations (size_t size) for (align = 1; align <= pagesize; align *= 2) { test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (memalign (align, size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); /* posix_memalign expects an alignment that is a power of 2 *and* a @@ -151,7 +172,13 @@ test_large_aligned_allocations (size_t size) if ((size % align) == 0) { test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (aligned_alloc (align, size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); } } @@ -159,11 +186,23 @@ test_large_aligned_allocations (size_t size) /* Both valloc and pvalloc return page-aligned memory. */ test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (valloc (size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (pvalloc (size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); } @@ -226,6 +265,16 @@ do_test (void) test_large_aligned_allocations (SIZE_MAX - i); } + /* Allocation larger than PTRDIFF_MAX does play well with C standard, + since pointer subtraction within the object might overflow ptrdiff_t + resulting in undefined behavior. To prevent it malloc function fail + for such allocations. */ + for (size_t i = 1; i <= FOURTEEN_ON_BITS; i++) + { + test_large_allocations (PTRDIFF_MAX + i); + test_large_aligned_allocations (PTRDIFF_MAX + i); + } + #if __WORDSIZE >= 64 /* On 64-bit targets, we need to test a much wider range of too-large sizes, so we test at intervals of (1 << 50) that allocation sizes |