diff options
| author | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2018-07-10 09:24:40 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2018-07-10 10:28:39 -0300 |
| commit | b444e8f7cc40265c9a20ce5de5f3f6795b7f5028 (patch) | |
| tree | 440690b09fe22481ad1a6acb59cac784a50cbc2f | |
| parent | 7b2f4cedf044ea83f53f6b43a5bf6871eb9ce969 (diff) | |
| download | glibc-b444e8f7cc40265c9a20ce5de5f3f6795b7f5028.tar glibc-b444e8f7cc40265c9a20ce5de5f3f6795b7f5028.tar.gz glibc-b444e8f7cc40265c9a20ce5de5f3f6795b7f5028.tar.bz2 glibc-b444e8f7cc40265c9a20ce5de5f3f6795b7f5028.zip | |
Comment tst-ofdlocks-compat expected failure in some Linux releases
As pointed out in a libc-alpha thread [1], the misc/tst-ofdlocks-compat
may fail in some specific Linux releases. This patch adds a comment
along with a link to discussion in the test source code.
No changes are expected.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ofdlocks-compat.c: Add a comment about
a kernel issue which lead to test failure in some cases.
[1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-07/msg00243.html
| -rw-r--r-- | ChangeLog | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ofdlocks-compat.c | 8 |
2 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2018-07-10 Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> + + * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ofdlocks-compat.c: Add a comment about + a kernel issue which lead to test failure in some cases. + 2018-07-10 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> [BZ #23036] diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ofdlocks-compat.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ofdlocks-compat.c index d1d00eb3fb..03c4abfeff 100644 --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ofdlocks-compat.c +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ofdlocks-compat.c @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@ do_prepare (int argc, char **argv) #define PREPARE do_prepare +/* Linux between 4.13 and 4.15 return EOVERFLOW for LFS OFD locks usage + in compat mode (non-LFS ABI running on a LFS default kernel, such as + i386 on a x86_64 kernel or s390-32 on a s390-64 kernel) [1]. This is + a kernel issue because __NR_fcntl64 is the expected way to use OFD locks + (used on GLIBC for both fcntl and fcntl64). + + [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-07/msg00243.html */ + static int do_test (void) { |